Chiropractic Treatment of Disc Herniations Magnetic resonance imaging and clinical follow-up: study of 27 patients receiving chiropractic care for cervical and lumbar disc herniations. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 1996;19(9):597-606. |
This study examined 27 patients in a private chiropractic practice who presented with neck or back pain andwho had MRI-documented cervical or lumbar disc herniations that corresponded with clinical findings. “Treatment frequency was typically four to five times/wk for weeks 1 and 2, then three times/wk with decreasing frequency as the patient progressed. Duration of active care varied from 6 wk to 6 months.” If the patients did not reach these milestones, follow-up MRI was performed 1 year after the initiation of care. The study found that 22 of 27 (80%) had good clinical outcomes; 17 of the 22 (77%) “had not only
One important issue that the author addresses is the controversy of whether manipulation is contraindicated for disc herniation. After reviewing the literature, and from his clinical findings, he concludes that manipulation is indeed safe for disc herniation: “…in the cervical and lumbar spine, rotational manipulation most likely cannot be implicated in disc failure or exacerbation of a disc herniation, and for rotational forces from a manipulation to be involved in disc failure, facet fracture must occur first.” No complications occurred in this study. BenEliyahu DJ. |
Autonomic Nervous System Function Among Individuals With Acute Musculoskeletal Injury
|
Scientific validation on how manipulation effects the nervous system. “It is well established that nociceptive and other aberrant neurologicalfrom dysfunctional musculoskeletal structures of any component of frame influences the autonomic nervous system.”
|
United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) randomised trial: cost effectiveness of physical treatments for back pain in British Medical Journal 2004;329:1381 December11, 2004
|
“A UK trial comparing private Chiropractic and NHS outpatient treatment found that reductions in time off work more than offset the net health service cost incurred by Chiropractic .” [Meade TW, Dyer S, Browne W, Townsend J, Frank AO. Low back pain of mechanical origin: randomised comparison of Chiropractic and hospital outpatient treatment. BMJ 1990;300: 1431-7]. |
Comparative Analysis of Individuals With and Without Chiropractic Coverage Patient Characteristics, Utilization, and Costs Archives of Internal Medicine. October 11, 2004;164:1985-1992 Antonio P. Legorreta, MD, MPH; R. Douglas Metz, DC; Craig F. Nelson, DC, MS; Saurabh Ray, PhD; Helen Oster Chernicoff, MD, MSHS; Nicholas A. DiNubile, MD |
Several studies (mostly workers’ compensation studies) have shown the costeffectiveness of Chiropractic compared with medical management for neuromuscular conditions in a review of current literature. |
|
The Manga Report overwhelmingly supported the efficacy, safety, scientific validity, and cost-effectiveness of Chiropractic for low-back pain. Additionally, it found that higher patient satisfaction levels were associated with Chiropractic care than with medical treatment alternatives.
|
|
|
The RAND reports marked the first time that representatives of the medical community went on record stating that spinal manipulation is an appropriate treatment for certain low-back pain conditions.
|
|
|
In its 377-page report to the House of Representatives, the Commission
called its study "probably the most comprehensive and detailed
independent examination of Chiropractic ever undertaken in any
country." By the end of the inquiry, the commission reported
itself "irresistibly and with complete unanimity drawn to
the conclusion that modem Chiropractic is a soundly-based and
|
|
| A 1988 study of 10,652 Florida workers' compensation cases
was conducted by Steve Wolk, Ph.D., and reported by the Foundation
for Chiropractic Education and Research. It was concluded that "a claimant with a backrelated injury, when initially treated
by a chiropractor versus a medical doctor, is less likely to
become temporarily disabled, or if disabled, remains disabled
for a shorter period of time; and claimants treated by medical
doctors were hospitalized at a much higher rate than claimants
treated by chiropractors."
|
|
|
In 1989, a survey administered by Daniel C. Cherkin, Ph.D., and Frederick A. MacCornack, Ph.D., concluded that patients receiving care from health maintenance organizations (HMOs) within the state of Washington were three times as likely to report satisfaction with care from chiropractors as they were with care from other physicians. The patients were also more likely to believe that their chiropractor was concerned about them.
|
|
The study indicated that costs were significantly higher for medical claims than for Chiropractic claims; in addition, the number of work days lost was nearly ten times higher for those who received medical care instead of Chiropractic care.
|
|
A study by Miron Stano, Ph.D., reported in the June 1993
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics involved
395,641 patients with neuromusculoskeletal conditions. Results
over a two-year period showed that patients who received Chiropractic
care incurred significantly lower health care costs than did
patients treated solely by medical or osteopathic physicians.
|
|
A 12-month study conducted by P.S. Ebrall, BAppSc, and
reported in the June 1992 Chiropractic Journal ofAustralia indicated:
When Chiropractic management was chosen, fewer claimants required
compensation and fewer compensation days were taken. When medical
management was chosen, the aver.age payment per claim was greater
and a greater number of patients regressed to chronic status,
and the average payment per claim was greater.
|
|
Study that compared patients of family physicians and of chiropractors. The article stated "the number of days of disability for patients seen by family physicians was significantly higher (mean 39.7) than for patients managed by chiropractors (mean 10.8)." A related editorial inthe same issue referred to risks of complications from lumbar manipulation as being "very low."
|
|
Following a 1993 study, researchers J. David Cassidy, D.C., Haymo Thiel, D.C., M.S., and W. Kirkaldy-Willis, M.D., of the Back Pain Clinic at the Royal University Hospital in Saskatchewan concluded that "the treatment of lumbar intervertebral disk herniation by side posture manipulation is both safe and effective."
|
|
A 1978 study conducted by J.S. Wight, D.C., and reported
in the ACA Journal of Chiropractic, indicated that 74.6% of patients
with recurring headaches, including migraines, were either cured
or experienced reduced headache symptomatology after receiving
Chiropractic manipulation.
|
|
A 1992 study conducted by L.G. Schifrin, Ph.D., provided
an economic assessment of mandated health insurance coverage
for Chiropractic treatment within the Commonwealth of Virginia.
As reported by the College of William and Mary, and the Medical
College of Virginia, the study indicated that Chiropractic provides
therapeutic benefits at economical costs. The report also recommended
that Chiropractic be a widely available form of health care.
|
|
In 1985 the University of Saskatchewan conducted a study
of 283 patients "who had not responded to previous conservative
or operative treatment" and who were initially classified
as totally disabled. The study revealed that "81% ... became
symptom free or achieved a state of mild intermittent pain with
no work restrictions" after daily spinal manipulations were
administered.
|
|
A study conducted by T.W. Meade, a medical doctor, and
reported in the June 2, 1990, British Medical Journal concluded
after two years of patient monitoring, "for patients with
low-back pain in whom manipulation is not contraindicated, Chiropractic
almost certainly confers worthwhile, long-term benefit in comparison
with hospital outpatient management."
|
|
A 1992 review of data from over 2,000,000 users of Chiropractic care in the U.S., reported in the Journal ofAmerican Health Policyt stated that "Chiropractic users tend to have substantially lower total health care costs," and "Chiropractic care reduces the use of both physician and hospital care." |
| Home | Download Forms |
About Active Release |
About Chiropractic |
About Massage |
|
Disclaimer This information is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice. You should not use this information to diagnose or treat a health problem or disease without consulting with a qualified health care provider. Please consult your health care provider with any questions or concerns you may have regarding your condition.Any attempt to diagnose and treat an illness using the information in this site should come under the direction of a trained medical practitioner. We accept no responsible for any adverse effects or consequences resulting from the use of any of the suggestions or procedures in this site or related internet links. By using the information in this web site you are confirming that you understand this statement and that you accept all risk and responsibility. All matters regarding your health should be supervised by your health care provider. All information provided in this site is for the purpose of education, not treatment. The information provided by or linked to on this site may or may not reflect the opinions of Dr. Brian Abelson. It does not represent the opinions of the Alberta Chiropractic Association or other affiliated associations. |